A key issue in the Columbia School of Journalism’s report on Rolling Stone‘s botched rape story is the use of pseudonyms to identify key characters in the story.
I strongly endorse this conclusion of the Columbia report:
Pseudonyms are inherently undesirable in journalism. They introduce fiction and ask readers to trust that this is the only instance in which a publication is inventing details at its discretion. Their use in this case was a crutch — it allowed the magazine to evade coming to terms with reporting gaps. Rolling Stone should consider banning them.
I made a similar point in December in my post (after the story began falling apart) about interviewing rape survivors and verifying their stories:
View original post 978 more words